18th May 2021 ✦ Laura (RGB)
The following document is a statement from the ‘Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, Operational sub-group (SPI-M-O)’, titled ‘Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2, 31 March 2021’. It can be found on the government website.
On page 9, section 31 of this document, it predicts that there will be a third wave in autumn, and blames the resurgence partly on children not having been injected:
“The resurgence is a result of some people (mostly children) being ineligible for vaccination; others choosing not to receive the vaccine; and others being vaccinated but not perfectly protected (including those who have only received one dose, rather than two).”
In September, the injection will be rolled out to children. This will coincide with the ‘third wave’, which may be the first serious and visible public health crisis of the ‘pandemic’ within the UK, as people who have had the mRNA injections are predicted by many eminent (yet censored) doctors to fall sick or die due to damaged immune systems and antibody-dependent enhancement. The rollout of the injections to children will therefore be extremely forceful. The document admits that those who have two doses of the injection will be most at risk, yet blames the resurgence on those that chose not to get the injection or complete their doses. There will be a push during the ‘third wave’ to frighten or shame more people into getting injections – and to inject their children. If they are not successful, they will try again with further waves, blaming resurgences on the decreasing pool of the yet-to-be injected.
We might not be able to do anything for the those whose parents choose to have their child injected. The issue is that even wary parents may lose control over what happens to their child if they are not careful. We may be faced with a situation where parents are being told they have no choice but to inject their child (and, unfortunately, believing that to be the case) or injections administered to pupils on school grounds without proper parental consent or knowledge.
The Gillick test can used by doctors to determine whether or not a child can consent to medical treatment without parental consent, and I believe this could be wildly misused during the injection rollout.
Parents, teachers, and children must all learn about what constitutes legal and valid informed consent. If a patient is not properly informed about a medical procedure or is coerced or forced into consenting to it, their consent is not legal or valid, and medical staff are committing medical malpractice.
School staff must notify their headteachers that they may be found personally accountable for any injuries or deaths resulting from medical experiments being run in their schools. School staff must not be involved or in support of any attempt to medically experiment on their pupils through the administering of the COVID mRNA injections.
We must remain vigilant of efforts to further traumatise and coerce the public through fear campaigns, statistical games and manipulative propaganda.
The mRNA injections have caused severe injuries and deaths. The mRNA injections are not proven to prevent infection or transmission of any virus. The long-term effects of the mRNA injection are not known. Children are not at risk of severe illness or death from SARS-COV-2.
Children should not be subjected to this experimental gene therapy. There is no sane reason to submit a child to this clinical trial.